Twitter seeks to improve its application regarding the misuse of people’s private content, while expanding its own private information policy now include “private media”, which refers to images that are shared via tweet without the consent of the person shown in them.
As he explains Twitter:
“Sharing personal media, such as pictures or videos, can potentially violate a person’s privacy and can lead to emotional or physical harm. The abuse of private media can affect everyone, but it can have a disproportionate effect on women, activists, dissidents and members of minority communities. ”
Accordingly, Twitter says that now that it receives a report that the tweet contains unauthorized private media, it will take action in line with its existing privacy enforcement options.
These may include restricting the visibility of the tweet, requiring the removal of the tweet, hiding the tweet while waiting for implementation, and, ultimately, suspending orders and bans in extreme cases.
Twitter has a policy relating to ‘revenge pornography’ especially since 2017, which stipulates that users:
“It may not post or share intimate photographs or videos of anyone produced or distributed without their consent. ”
This new expansion seems to be more focused on doxxing and ousting certain individuals into expanded application, although, technically, similar rules, at least in extreme cases, have been around for some time, only Twitter is now bringing them into its broader policy, and ideally, make more users aware of such limitations.
Twitter notes that the policy does not apply to media representing public figures or individuals “when the media and accompanying tweet texts are shared in the public interest or add value to public discourse”, while Twitter also says that Imagicians and videos depicting people participating in public events, such as large-scale protests and sporting events, would generally not violate this policy.
So, there are some concessions for discussions of valuable news or public interest, which Twitter will judge on a case-by-case basis. But it could help provide greater protection to users and raise awareness of users ’rights in situations where their image has been used without consent.
But it could also be confusing. For example, if you don’t have the permission of every person involved in the video or image you tweet, will you break the new rules?
Well, yes and no – for Twitter to be able to do that, it needs to get a complaint first by the person shown or by an authorized representative. In the vast majority of cases, these people will not issue a removal request, but if they do, you will probably be required to remove them if Twitter considers that there is a relevant cause for concern, based on the complaint and the context.
So, there may be some changes in the way such offenses are enforced, but for the most part, regulations already existed, in some form, for the most obvious and most damaging cases.
But that could be another element to consider in your process – you can read more about the technical details of the update here.
Friendly communicator. Music maven. Explorer. Pop culture trailblazer. Social media practitioner.