Twitter is preparing for a wider launch of anti-voice responses to better understand user responses

Twitter’s new rejection option could soon be available to more users, along with a reverse engineering expert Jane Manchun Wong recent sighting this introductory screen in the application background code.

As you can see here, the new introductory screen describes how anti-response voices work – which as such are not designed to be a dislike option, but more a measure of how much each response is worth on a tweet and what it adds and what doesn’t, to the overall user experience.

Twitter has been testing negative votes for responses from selected users over the past few months, raising various questions about how this could be applied and what it might mean for a tweet engagement.

As Twitter explained to SMT back in July:

We hope to better understand what people believe are relevant responses and how this matches what Twitter suggests as most relevant responses under the tweet. “

The critical element here is that the votes for and against will not be public – and more than that, Twitter says it will not affect the ranking of individual responses, at least not in the immediate term.

What’s the point then?

Well, in the end, they could make the responses to the tweets more interesting. Sometimes, when you check the responses to a viral tweet, you can see a bunch of tweets scams or people complaining about hacking or punishing their accounts or calling for help for random reasons.

Perhaps this makes the series of responses less interesting, and if Twitter could better highlight the tweets with the most responsive responses in each, it could encourage even more conversation on each topic and get more users to tweet more often by focusing on the best discussion queries and lowering rankings. rest.

At the same time, it could be confusing. Again, Twitter’s response is negative it’s not a vote to approve or disapprove of every single statement and comment, but that nuance can be hard to convey if Twitter really offers a broader option.

But maybe that’s actually the point – maybe Twitter, as a broad research tool, will be able to gain more insight into the various elements to which people react negatively in the app and indicate, through votes against, that they want to see less in the app. their food. This could then steer the platform’s future direction to algorithmic and other initiatives – and Twitter has given itself a level of flexibility in the way such response data is used by not tying any final action to use its downwatch option.

It could ultimately be a valuable research tool in this regard, without linking to any direct result. Maybe then Twitter will learn more about user preferences for future development.

It could end up being a valuable tool, even if people abuse it, intentionally or not.

It looks like we’ll find out soon anyway. We will keep you informed of any progress

Source link

Naveen Kumar

Friendly communicator. Music maven. Explorer. Pop culture trailblazer. Social media practitioner.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button