Rittenhouse’s defense is calling for a wrong trial because Apple Mail compressed the video

AppleInsider is supported by its audience and can earn a commission as an Amazon Associate and associate partner for eligible purchases. These affiliate partnerships do not affect our editorial content.

Apple technologies were again in the spotlight at the ongoing trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, and the defense on Wednesday demanded the annulment of the proceedings because lawyers with Android devices received a compressed video file from the iPhone.

Rittenhouse, 18, is on trial for shooting and killing two protesters and wounding a third at a 2020 racial justice protest in Kenosha, Wis. He is accused of murder, attempted murder and reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon.

During today’s proceedings, prosecutors filed a motion for dismissal filed by the defense earlier this week, reports CNN.

Rittenhouse’s lawyers say their version of the drone footage, which was seen as evidence for the defense, was of much lower quality than the video submitted to prosecutors.

As he noticed The Verge, who reported on the development earlier today, the video was broadcast for the first time Fox News when the defendant’s lawyer appeared on the Tucker Carlson Show. Prosecutors received a better version of the same video than the person who recorded it on November 5, five days after the trial began.

The individual approached investigators after the trial began and used AirDrop to transmit the video to the detective, who later tried to hand the file to AirDrop’s defense attorneys. Rittenhouse attorney Natalie Wisco could not receive the transfer because she is using an Android phone, so the detective sent the file via email. As Apple’s Mail app automatically compresses video attachments, the 11.2 MB file that the state had was sent to the defense as a 3.6 MB file.

“The problem is that the prosecution provided the defense with a compressed version of the recording,” the request said. “This means that the video submitted to the defense was not as clear as the footage kept by the state.”

According to The Verge , Assistant District Attorney James Kraus said: “We didn’t know it was going to happen. We gave what we fully believed the whole file to Ms. Wisco […] it arrived without objection and was a four-day exhibition, shown to the jury in full screen. “

Judge Bruce Schroeder said he planned to call an expert witness and take testimony from a lawyer to resolve the matter, CNN reports. The verdict has yet to arrive while the jurors are deliberating.

This is at least the second time that Apple technologies have taken center stage in the trial. Last week, the defense objected to the playback of surveillance footage on the iPad, saying the tablet’s zoom function changes images.

Source link

Naveen Kumar

Friendly communicator. Music maven. Explorer. Pop culture trailblazer. Social media practitioner.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button