Apple is asking the court to remain part of the ban on the Epic Games lawsuit

AppleInsider is supported by its audience and can earn a commission as an Amazon Associate and associate partner for eligible purchases. These affiliate partnerships do not affect our editorial content.

Apple told the court that it adheres to one part of the ban it received after the trial of the Epic Games App Store, because the company is trying to delay the implementation of other elements of the verdict.

Following the September verdict of U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the Epic-Apple lawsuit, Apple filed an appeal and asked for the ban to be postponed in early October. In a new submission to the court, Apple says that it did something that the court asked for, but it still wants the rest to be put on hold.

These changes included updating the anti-management provisions in its developer guidelines, providing greater flexibility in contacting users and advertising to users of alternative payment methods. However, Apple has yet to change the rules regarding external connectivity or metadata buttons for external payment mechanisms.

The court file was seen on Friday iMore mentions that Apple has complied with part of the ban, and reiterated that it has already filed an appeal to postpone the remainder of the ban. According to Apple, “the immediate implementation of that aspect of the ban would disrupt the integrity of the iOS ecosystem.”

Apple believes that since the court said Apple’s requirements to force users to use in-app purchases to sell digital content would be fine, eliminating restrictions on in-app messaging would effectively work against that. Removing the restriction would “force Apple to make its intellectual property available free of charge and would reduce the security and privacy provided to users.”

It is further argued that the ban will not go through a revision, as Epic Games has no status to secure or enforce the ban due to a lack of developer accounts and there are no products in the App Store.

As retention would not theoretically harm Epic due to a lack of warrants, Apple believes that remaining in the remaining elements of the ban should be in the public interest. What Apple has done with its policy for developers shows “that the company is working in good faith to improve consumer access to information in a way that preserves the integrity of the ecosystem.”

If the court does not want to grant a full stay, Apple insists that a temporary stay be held instead, at least until the Ninth Round can hear Apple’s appeal.

On October 23, Epic objected to Apple’s earlier appeal, saying such a departure should not be allowed because Apple does not meet the legal standard of proving that it faces irreparable damage under the provisions. Epic’s allegations include Apple’s post-trial comments saying the verdict was positive in nature, as well as Apple’s delay in filing a motion to postpone the ban.

A hearing to discuss Apple’s complaint and other matters is scheduled for November 9. The company has until December 9 to implement the full ban.

Source link

Naveen Kumar

Friendly communicator. Music maven. Explorer. Pop culture trailblazer. Social media practitioner.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button