Apple exercises full control over the state digital ID program: Report

The image for the article, titled Apple, shows its freak of internal control to states that implement digital IDs

Photography: Josh Edelson / AFP (Getty Images)

It’s no secret that Apple can be a weirdo to control, so, pretty a lot everything. The company’s position obviously extends to the countries with which it has signed agreements for introduction digital ID in the Wallet app, though you would expect governments to pull such things off.

A report based on confidential contract documents obtained by CNBC and released on Sunday reportedly describes how strict Apple can be when doing business with others, although in this case states are involved.Georgia, Arizona, Kentucky and Oklahoma — they won’t they pay the company to give it the data of its residents. The signed contracts were “practically identical” in all states, according to the agency, and were obtained through requests for public records.

The CNBC investigation obtained contracts for only the four states listed above, but it should be noted that a total of eight states, including Connecticut, Iowa, Maryland and Utah, have agreed to introduce digital IDs with Apple.

In addition to resource allocation, Apple was reportedly prescribed on many other issues as well.

It’s Apple’s program, don’t forget that

This is Apple’s program and he wants to be involved in every part of it. According to CNBC, contracts with states reveal that the company has “sole discretion” on key aspects of the program. These aspects include devices compatible with digital IDs, the way states should report on program performance, the program launch date, and the marketing required.

In addition, Apple is forcing states to abide by it security protocols determined by the International Organization for Standardization for Mobile Driving Licenses. The company played an “active role” in developing standards and says it sets “clear guidelines” for protecting consumer privacy.

States don’t pay Apple directly, but they do pay other things

As already mentioned, money in this situation does not change the owner, but that does not mean that the digital identification program is free. In particular, states — and still, their taxpayers — must share the money to support the launch of the program, from hiring staff and devoting sufficient resources to monitoring Apple’s time frame. and performing quality testing. Apple also wants someone dedicated to specifically answering his questions.

“If requested by Apple, the Agency will designate one or more project managers who will be responsible for answering Apple’s questions and concerns regarding the Program,” the contract states, as reported by CNBC.

States must encourage the adoption of digital IDs among residents and other government entities

Apple is used to success and expects states to strive for it as well. That is why states are obliged by contract to offer digital IDs to residents “proactively”. States are not allowed to charge for digital IDs, according to Apple.

But the work of the state does not end there. They must also encourage the adoption of digital identification documents among other state and federal government entities, such as the International Tax Service and the police.

Apple is not responsible for identity verification on digital IDs

Despite his public insistence that digital IDs in Wallet should be safe and practical, Apple doesn’t want to get its hands dirty. It states that it is absolutely not responsible for identity verification on digital IDs.

Gizmodo contacted Apple on Sunday for comment on the CNBC report, but did not receive a response by the time it was released. We will make sure to update this blog if we respond.

As CNBC points out, the complete lack of control that states show in these agreements is confusing. Yes, it is clear that they want access to Apple’s technology and (probably) the brand’s reputation, but the company also wants something from them. He wants the opportunity to provide another service to customers who do The iPhone is irreplaceable. Therefore, the states reasonably had more freedom in negotiations than they thought.

They may have been stunned, or perhaps intimidated by the technological aspects of offering digital government IDs. In any case, that is not an excuse. State governments should work the best interest of the people, but these contracts show that they only worked to get the best deal for Apple. Now taxpayers in these states are stuck paying the price.

You can read the great CNBC investigation in its entirety here.

Source link

Naveen Kumar

Friendly communicator. Music maven. Explorer. Pop culture trailblazer. Social media practitioner.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button