A federal judge dismisses the lawsuit, claiming the App Store is a monopoly

A federal judge on Tuesday rejected a lawsuit claiming that Apple has a monopoly on the distribution of applications on iOS.

The creators of Coronavirus Reporter sued Cupertino for denying their title from the App Store. But U.S. District Judge Edward Chen issued a 34-page verdict saying the developers’ arguments “didn’t work.”

Apple has won a lawsuit against the apparent monopoly of the App Store

Coronavirus Reporter, a third-party contact tracking application, was denied App Store approval last year after Apple decided to allow only COVID-19 applications from trusted government organizations and medical or educational institutions.

After filing a complaint, Apple told the developers of the application that Coronavirus Reporter was banned because “the data generated by users was not checked for accuracy by a reputable source.”

But the creators of the app, along with other developers who have been sued, argue that Apple simply used its power over the App Store to benefit itself and its partners for anti-competitive reasons.

The lawsuit sought a preliminary ban that would temporarily block Apple from rejecting certain apps – and prevent the company from charging developers $ 99 a year in fees to submit to the App Store.

But Chen didn’t buy it.

There is no case

“Chen rejected the motion for a ban as unnecessary after dismissing the lawsuit,” the report said. Courthouse News. “Chen found that the developers failed to adequately identify the market over which Apple has monopoly control.”

Developers have tried to claim that Apple dominates two markets – the “US smartphone market” and the “US iOS smartphone market” – but Chen said their market definitions are unclear and “failed to pass the test”. He also said that the developers did not provide evidence of how the ranking of the App Store suppressed certain applications, and did not offer any facts that would justify the antitrust claim.

“Prosecutors do not define the area of ​​effective competition in which they compete,” the decision said. “They are not smartphone makers. Nor do they provide any other basis for the court to determine that the U.S. smartphone market is an ‘area of ​​effective competition’ for plaintiffs’ lawsuits. “

A big win for Apple

Keith Matthews, a lawyer representing the developers of Coronavirus Reporters, said they intend to appeal the decision. But as things stand, it’s a big win for Apple that could have implications in other cases.

This is not the first time that Apple has been accused of a monopoly over the App Store. Fortnite the developer of Epic Games famously accused him of the same. Cupertino can now use this federal ruling in other cases in support.

Source link

Naveen Kumar

Friendly communicator. Music maven. Explorer. Pop culture trailblazer. Social media practitioner.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button